The Health of Stock Mean Reversion: Dead, Dying or Doing Just Fine

My second post on this blog was a look at mean reversion, Is mean reversion dead? Given I am using a new data provider(Norgate Data), it has been almost two years since that post and there have been other articles on this recently, I figured it was time to check again. The research will focus on Russell 1000 stocks since 1995. The test is back to 1995 covers 3 bull markets and 2 bear markets.

Continue reading

July 22, 2015

Multiple Time Frames for Scoring ETF Rotational Strategies

Today we have a guest post from David Weilmuenster who I worked with while at Connors Research.

A widely applied technique for scoring assets in rotational systems is to rank those assets by their price momentum, or return, over a given historical window and to rotate into the assets with higher momentum. This approach seeks to capitalize on the well-demonstrated tendency for price momentum to persist. But, it begs some questions:

  1. “What is an appropriate historical period for measuring price momentum?” Clearly, the momentum of a given asset can rank quite differently compared to the tradable universe over 1 month, 3 months, or 6 months.
  2. “Is one historical period sufficient?” If relative momentum can vary widely depending on the historical window, would it be better to consider multiple slices of history?
  3. Is higher momentum always preferable to lower momentum, especially if the system rules filter the tradable universe before scoring the ETFs for rotation?

Continue reading

July 15, 2015

What I am reading: July 15, 2015

Recent articles that I found interesting and made me think. For more articles see the quant mashup Quantocracy.

Five Myths About Data-Mining Bias

“Data-mining is widely used nowadays for trading algo development. There are several myths about how to deal with data-mining bias.”

Average Returns, Rarer Than You Think

“During the course of the 89 years covered by the chart, we never had a single year when the annualized compound return was simply the average!”

All Strategies “Blow Up”

“In this article, we will explain why even good strategies must test investors’ ReSolve every now and then in order to deliver long-term excess returns.”

Annual Asset Class Returns

I always love seeing this chart.

 

Good Quant Trading,

June 10, 2015

What I am reading: June 10, 2015

Recent articles that I found interesting and made me think. For more articles see the quant mashup Quantocracy.

Tactical Asset Allocation: Beware of Geeks Bearing Formulas

The first time one can actually realize how good (bad) his chosen backtesting solution is when the strategy is traded live. However I am always amazed how little some traders pay attention to how closely their backtest match their live results.”

 

Torturing Historical Market Data

There’s no such thing as right or wrong data, just better or worse. Stock market data looks spotless when you just see the performance numbers, but looks can be deceiving.

Screw It, I’m All In, Baby

A little humor for your day but oh so true.

 

Improving the Simple ETF Rotational Trading Model

What I love about trading models like this is the simplicity. So often simplicity trumps complication. Simple systems often have one important characteristic. They often get you out of the market during bear markets and get you back in to ride the next bull cycle. That is, if you are disciplined enough to actually follow the rules, which of course is another entire topic.

May 22, 2015

ATAA Conference Trip Report

I am back from the Australian Technical Analysis Association meeting in the Gold Coast, Australia. I had a great time meeting readers of the blog and other traders. Lots of good presentations. My favorites include those by Alan Clement and Andrew Gibbs, which provided me with new research ideas. These include trend following and using fundamental data. Rande Howell talked about our emotions, which as quant traders we believe we can ignore but we cannot.

Continue reading

May 6, 2015

How good is Smart Beta?

A popular topic lately has been “Smart beta” ETFs. What is smart beta? It is using different ways to weight an index and the ETF that tracks it. For example, the S&P500 index is a capitalization weighted index. Bigger companies have a larger portion of the index. If you look at the SPY, Apple which is the largest company, accounts for 4% of the index (https://www.spdrs.com/product/fund.seam?ticker=spy). Other ways one can weight an index are equal weight, by volatility, by fundamental measures, by technical measures and so on. Why would you do this? To beat the returns of the S&P500 index . But are these other ways better?

Continue reading

1 12 13 14 15 16 19