Cesar Alvarez

Author Archives: Cesar Alvarez

July 15, 2015

What I am reading: July 15, 2015

Recent articles that I found interesting and made me think. For more articles see the quant mashup Quantocracy.

Five Myths About Data-Mining Bias

“Data-mining is widely used nowadays for trading algo development. There are several myths about how to deal with data-mining bias.”

Average Returns, Rarer Than You Think

“During the course of the 89 years covered by the chart, we never had a single year when the annualized compound return was simply the average!”

All Strategies “Blow Up”

“In this article, we will explain why even good strategies must test investors’ ReSolve every now and then in order to deliver long-term excess returns.”

Annual Asset Class Returns

I always love seeing this chart.

 

Good Quant Trading,

June 10, 2015

What I am reading: June 10, 2015

Recent articles that I found interesting and made me think. For more articles see the quant mashup Quantocracy.

Tactical Asset Allocation: Beware of Geeks Bearing Formulas

The first time one can actually realize how good (bad) his chosen backtesting solution is when the strategy is traded live. However I am always amazed how little some traders pay attention to how closely their backtest match their live results.”

 

Torturing Historical Market Data

There’s no such thing as right or wrong data, just better or worse. Stock market data looks spotless when you just see the performance numbers, but looks can be deceiving.

Screw It, I’m All In, Baby

A little humor for your day but oh so true.

 

Improving the Simple ETF Rotational Trading Model

What I love about trading models like this is the simplicity. So often simplicity trumps complication. Simple systems often have one important characteristic. They often get you out of the market during bear markets and get you back in to ride the next bull cycle. That is, if you are disciplined enough to actually follow the rules, which of course is another entire topic.

May 22, 2015

ATAA Conference Trip Report

I am back from the Australian Technical Analysis Association meeting in the Gold Coast, Australia. I had a great time meeting readers of the blog and other traders. Lots of good presentations. My favorites include those by Alan Clement and Andrew Gibbs, which provided me with new research ideas. These include trend following and using fundamental data. Rande Howell talked about our emotions, which as quant traders we believe we can ignore but we cannot.

Continue reading

May 6, 2015

How good is Smart Beta?

A popular topic lately has been “Smart beta” ETFs. What is smart beta? It is using different ways to weight an index and the ETF that tracks it. For example, the S&P500 index is a capitalization weighted index. Bigger companies have a larger portion of the index. If you look at the SPY, Apple which is the largest company, accounts for 4% of the index (https://www.spdrs.com/product/fund.seam?ticker=spy). Other ways one can weight an index are equal weight, by volatility, by fundamental measures, by technical measures and so on. Why would you do this? To beat the returns of the S&P500 index . But are these other ways better?

Continue reading

April 29, 2015

Interviewed on Better System Trader

I was recently interviewed on Better System Trader. Go here to listen to it. He also has some other good interviews with Jake Bernstein and Brent Penfold which I listened to. I need to get around to the Nick Radge interview because I am meeting him next month at the 2015 Australian Technical Analysts Association.

Some quotes from my interview.

There is nothing that will dig at you like trading with real money on the line.

Most of the time huge losses can’t be avoided because they’re overnight gaps you can do nothing about.

The wrong time to be making your plan is in the middle of a trade.

 

Got questions about the interview? Send them my way here.

As a side note, the site got a makeover because the site was not “mobile-friendly” which Google does not like. If you see any problems or have comments, email me.

Good Quant Trading,

April 15, 2015

Re-balancing: Is it worth the time and effort?

David Weilmuenster is today’s guest author. David and I worked together at Connors Research for eight years and is one great researcher and AmiBroker programmer.

Brochures for professionally managed investments and academic white papers on long term investing almost always praise the benefits of regularly re-balancing a portfolio. The benefits can arise from the interaction, or correlation, of periodic returns among the constituent assets in a portfolio. As the correlations among constituent assets decrease, the long term returns of the overall portfolio generally will increase with regular re-balancing. This has become known as “the only free lunch in investing”, although it does not work out that way in all situations.

Continue reading

April 1, 2015

What I am reading: April 1, 2015

Recent articles that I found interesting and made me think. For more articles see the quant mashup Quantocracy.

99 Problems But A Backtest Ain’t One– “The first time one can actually realize how good (bad) his chosen backtesting solution is when the strategy is traded live. However I am always amazed how little some traders pay attention to how closely their backtest match their live results.

Torturing Historical Market Data – The first sentence is so true. “There’s no such thing as right or wrong data, just better or worse. Stock market data looks spotless when you just see the performance numbers, but looks can be deceiving.

Screw It, I’m All In, Baby – A little chart humor but so true.

Improving the Simple ETF Rotational Trading Model – “What I love about trading models like this is the simplicity. So often simplicity trumps complication. Simple systems often have one important characteristic. They often get you out of the market during bear markets and get you back in to ride the next bull cycle. That is, if you are disciplined enough to actually follow the rules, which of course is another entire topic.”

The Martian by Andy Weir – I read maybe one fiction book every 2-3 years. This is a great book. A fun and entertaining read. Be warned you will lose sleep.

Good Quant Trading,

1 12 13 14 15 16 19